The Rise Of The American Revolution - 1818 Words

1. Eighteenth-century colonial population growth- From 1700 to 1775 the colonies experienced a population growth from 250,000 people to 2.5 million people by the beginning of the American Revolution. There were factors to this great population increase. The factors include natural increase because the colonists were living longer and their children were having children, an influx of immigrants from Ireland and Germany, and the increased immigration of African American slaves. 2. The First Great Awakening- In the 1720’s Church membership was declining as more rational thinking, and scientific advancements were being made. So Puritans like Johnathon Edwards and George Whitefield helped revive religion with new thinking. This awakening†¦show more content†¦Fighting didn’t just occur in North America it was a global war as well fought in Europe and the Caribbean islands. The British were able to defeat the French in this war. essentially take the majority of the land that France had had in North America except for two small islands off the coast of Nova Scotia. Spain gained the Louisiana territory as a result of fighting in the war. 5. Treaty of Paris/Peace of Paris 1763- The British were victorious in the war and gained all the land in North America that France had. Spain received the Louisiana territory because the British didn’t want it and weren’t going to let the French keep it. 6. The Proclamation of 1763- After the victory Britain declared that all the land west of the Appalachian mountains could not be settled until they made treaties with the natives living in those regions. This caused the colonists to become angry because they wanted to settle the areas west of the Appalachian Mountains and this is what caused tension to rise between the colonies and England. 7. Individual representation- When Parliament imposed taxes to try to pay off the massive wartime debt the colonists refused to because they claimed they didn’t have representation in Parliament. This was true there was no single person in Parliament representing the colonies , but the representation was never wanted because the colonies would be outvoted on matters by parliament. 8. Virtual

Marketing American Broadcasting Company and Disney

178 PART 3 CONNECTING WITH CUSTOMERS Applications Marketing Debate Is Target Marketing Ever Bad? As marketers increasingly tailor marketing programs to target market segments, some critics have denounced these efforts as exploitive. They see the preponderance of billboards advertising cigarettes and alcohol in low-income urban areas as taking advantage of a vulnerable market segment. Critics can be especially harsh in evaluating marketing programs that target African Americans and other minority groups, claiming they often employ stereotypes and inappropriate depictions. Others counter that targeting and positioning is critical to marketing, and that these marketing programs are an attempt to be relevant to a certain consumer†¦show more content†¦Disney’s greatest challenge today is to keep a 90year-old brand relevant and current to its core audience while staying true to its heritage and core brand values. Disney’s CEO Bob Iger explained, â€Å"As a brand that people seek out and trust, it opens doors to new platforms and markets, and hence to new consum ers. When you deal with a company that has a great legacy, you deal with decisions and conflicts that arise from the clash of heritage versus innovation versus relevance. I’m a big believer in respect for heritage, but I’m also a big believer in the need to innovate and the need to balance that respect for heritage with a need to be relevant.† Internally, Disney has focused on the Disney Difference—â€Å"a value-creation dynamic based on high standards of quality and recognition that set Disney apart from its competitors.† Disney leverages all aspects of its businesses and abilities to touch its audience in multiple ways, efficiently and economically. Disney’s Hannah Montana provides an excellent example of how the company took a tween-targeted television show and moved it across its various creative divisions to become a significant franchise for the company, including millions of CD sales, videoShow MoreRelatedCase Study Disney1005 Words   |  5 Pages02/11/08 Agenda ââ€" º About Disney ââ€" º Divisions of Disney ââ€" º A bit of History ââ€" º About the CASE ââ€" º SWOT Analysis ââ€" º Its Current Executive Management ââ€" º Recommended Organizational structures ï‚ § Model 1 ï‚ § Model 2 ï‚ § Model 3 02/11/08 About Disney ââ€" º ââ€" º ââ€" º ââ€" º The Walt Disney Company (most commonly known as Disney) (NYSE: DIS) is one of the largest media and entertainment corporations in the world. Founded on October 16, 1923 by brothers Walt and Roy Disney as a small animation studio TodayRead MoreEssay Euro Disney the Failure1269 Words   |  6 PagesWalt Disney is the world leader in family entertainment and one of the most valuable brands in the world. Recently, Walt Disney has decided to open up a Disney Theme Park in Hong Kong China, which will be the first theme park in China. Since the opening of Euro Disney, the Walt Disney Company has learned to take into consideration important determinants so that their investment will not be a huge financial loss. Unfortunately, Since Disney did not research as much as they should of when decidingRead MoreWalt Disney Company Is Worth Investing1348 Words   |  6 PagesAs one of the largest multimedia companies in the world, The Walt Disney Company includes all aspects of American entertai nment, including animation, music, production, and theme parks. Founded in 1923 by brothers Walt and Roy O. Disney, the business has grown from silent animations films to diversify into all aspects of the entertainment industry, primarily focusing on all interests of the typical American family. The company, since its founding, has proved to be a worthy investment on all standingsRead MoreMergers and Acquisition939 Words   |  4 Pagesas fast as possible. As companies work hard to beat their competitors they accept many tactics to do so. As for my assignment, I have chosen to examine why Disney and Pixar merged as a company. A brief definition of an Acquisition and a merger will be given following with the difference between them. I will be discussing if these two companies were a success or a failure and why and which were their reasons behind this statement. A merger is a combination of two companies, which form a new firmRead MoreDisney : The Worlds Leading Provider For The Entertainment Industry1006 Words   |  5 PagesThe Walt Disney Company mission is to be the world s leading provider to the entertainment industry. The strategic components of The Disney Company’s future growth comprise of creative innovations to attract visitors to its parks and resorts, increase viewership and subscription dues for media networks and streaming services. Parks and Resorts Disney offers the operations of parks and resorts not just in the United States, but also in various countries. The driving revenue includes theme park transportationRead MoreMedia And The Global Media1417 Words   |  6 Pagesincreasing concentration of ownership of different types of media within large conglomerates that have come to be known as super companies. Many of the vast media conglomerates have gone on to form media empires which control the flow of information across the world. Some of these media empires are Time Warner, ABC/Disney, and Viacom. The idea of media super companies is one that creates discomfort for many, and not one which people should aspire to. Where enthusiasts see a dream, critics see a nightmareRead MoreWalt Disney Company : A Cartoon Studio2215 Words   |  9 PagesWalt Disney Company The birth of Walt Disney Company can be traced back in 1923 where it was founded by Walt Elias Disney as a cartoon studio. The company was initiated in California in the summer holidays with its first animation being about Alice Wonderland, which was made in Kansas City (Sanders, 2015). At those days, the company was identified as Disney Brothers Cartoon Studio. After four years of adhering to only one cartoon, Alice, Walt Disney decided to release new series of cartoons whichRead MoreThe Corporate World And The Walt Disney Company2024 Words   |  9 PagesFortune 500 companies are the top 500 companies in the U.S. which are listed by the Fortune magazine every year. The companies are generally ranked on the basis of their gross revenue (Fortune 500). The Fortune magazine started to enlist these 500 best company in 1955 for the first time. The concept of selecting best 500 American companies was first created by Edgar Smith, the editor of Fortune 500. In these 500 best companies, t he top companies are Wal-Mart Stores, Exxon Mobil, Chevron, BerkshireRead MoreThe Media Of Walt Disney Company1923 Words   |  8 PagesIntroduction Walt Disney Company is the most numerous mass media in the world and an entertainment conglomerate with the mass media networks of assets affection, studio entertainment, parks and resorts, and consumer goods. The television of Walt Disney Company and assets of the mass media network include television ABC network and ten radio stations. Besides, Walt Disney s portfolio cable networks include ABC Family, Disney Channel, Toon Disney, and ESPN (80% of ownership) (Balio, 2009). Walt Disney s studiosRead MoreBusiness, Disney, Swami2992 Words   |  12 PagesWalt Disney-Pixar Merger Brief Industry Analysis Because of the technology nowadays, one successful film can be distributed all over the world, which is in a form of motion pictures or DVD. Animation is one media that is spread all over the world; push it to be one of fastest growing industry. The demand for the animation is increasing from the emerging number of cables and satellite TV and the popularity of The Internet. In addition, in the past, the target market of the animation industry

Kanye West Analysis Free Essays

The song â€Å"So Appalled by Kanye West seems to be one of many songs on Kanye’s My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy, album that takes a straight forward attack on the life that Kanye lives but at the same time likes. It seems that the album itself makes many claims about the lifestyle and things that people in the high society do. Beyond that Kanye West is well known for his music being strictly more or less about the internal battle with himself. We will write a custom essay sample on Kanye West Analysis or any similar topic only for you Order Now One that is easily pointed out is â€Å"I’m trying to write my wrongs, But its funny these same wrongs helped me write this song. †(Touch the Sky) I would have to say that through Kanye West career as a song writer he’s is one of the most consistent artist that openly points out and accepts the life he lives as something that isn’t the most holy life to have. As I listen to the song So Appalled I noticed that of all the songs on the album this song seemed to have the most serious or viable beat to go with its pretty direct meaning. As I did the grammar and thesaurus changes to the song I did a lot of adding of the word I changing literally every verse into the first person and of course it sounded more like a story realistically about Kanye’s life. I think the most important changes to me was the changing of the word â€Å"ridiculous† to â€Å"unbelievable† and also changing â€Å"appalled† to â€Å"amazing† which in my eyes gave the song kind of a double meaning and also reminded me of another song he did that was actually called amazing done in the album before this 808 Heartbreak which is kind of the other half to this double meaning in the song. With most of the changes I made I feel like I changed the song to better resemble the song â€Å"Amazing† which is in first person as he talks strictly in one verse about him knowing he is a problem and saying that that’s something he is fine with and saying that you’ll never be able to take that away from him. So I don’t really believe I changed the song from its meaning just directed it and kind of tried to make it more direct which seems to be more like Kanye. In my eyes the song really talked about the way Kanye west realizes what he does in life really is kind of unbelievable and somewhat unrealistic to the everyday ife of a middle class or even a rich person who is just beginning to see the high life but hasn’t yet really experienced the whole package to think on this level. I believe that jay-Z verse is the most straight forward verse on the track that points out the sinful but amazingly unbelievable life the rappers live. I also kind of took this from Push T’s verse in the song were he starts out with â€Å"success is what you make it† â€Å"take it how it comes â€Å" as the verse goes on it seemed to me like he was talking telling a story of his like as if it was something you tell a child. He took the important concept of success and twisted it as if he’s success was good and turned to be someone what of an amazing but odd success that he is happy with but appalled with at the same time. The song really makes you think about how much the most successful rappers think about their lives as a whole. This song has to one of the most, straight forward and most creative songs created by Kanye West. I find it’s really confusing and interesting at the same time that the rappers in the song like the lives they live but at the same timed they call it ridiculous. How to cite Kanye West Analysis, Papers

Nestle Erp Case Study free essay sample

Nestle is a multinational company based on Switzerland, was establish long ago in 1866 by Henri nestle which supplies different kinds of food products. Over the period nestle has grown as one of the big company. Nestle USA is a part of nestle company, having seven business divisions: beverage, confection and snacks, food service, foreign trade, nutrition, prepared food and sales. Some of Its popular products in USA were: Alpo, Nescafe, Tasters choice. Its annual revenue was 8. 1 billion and 16000 employees were working. In 1992 enterprise resource planning (ERP) system provider SAP introduced the R3 system of client server architecture and Nestle USA has decided to implement R3 ERP system in 1997 and given a project name BEST ( business excellence through system technology). It had estimated cost of $210 million with total IT staff of 250 including outside consultant and estimated time to complete was 2003. To implement the ERP there are two choices; either you change your business process or customize the ERP system according to your business process. The CIO of nestle USA Jeri Dunn has consulted with the other key stakeholders from finance, supply chain, distribution and purchasing and came up with the idea of changing the Nestles business process to fit in with the ERP system. They assume that the new system would create saving through group buying and facilitate data sharing between subsidiaries. Implementation approach and its impacts Nestle was implementing a new system but they didn’t include the real user in stakeholder team who will have to face the change in business process. Those were the one working with the system but BEST project has ignored them. In other words, they failed to address the change management. They didn’t communicate with them to set expectation and prepare plan for the implementation. As a result Nestle faced a lot of peoples issue. Employee started to resist new system and no one wanted to learn the new system of doing things, which created a pressure to divisional executives and they became affronted with the employee. This has direct effect on the self-esteem of workers. Employee started to feel unsecure and pressurized in the new system and they started to leave the job. Scenario continued and reached 77 precent of employee turnover. Employees are the company’s assets, so Nestle lost their important asset which has impact on their day to day business. That new system created a lot of problems and the help desk was overloaded they are getting 300 calls per day. Nestle USA’s implementation problems did not stop with employee issues. The project team didn’t make a clear integration point between the modules to address the Y2K deadlines. This created the miss communication between modules. When the year 2000 started, the old system where only 2 digits were there to represent the year, created a lot of problems. Nestles BEST project was also infected by this confusion of Y2K deadline and the project was stopped due to lack of improper integration planning. Project team combined its separate brand in hurry to meet the time goal of the project they didn’t count the possible outcome of combining them without proper preparation. The project team, without doing the business process reengineering, necessarily replaced the divisional silos in to process silos. This created the conflict between the division and process silos were not in proper way of reengineering the whole business process of each division. After this big mess up of implementation of new system Nestle USA learned a big lesson about the process of ERP system implementation. The company restarted the SAP implementation from a claw mark. Stakeholder’s team reassembled to start the project. Now they have realized the importance of divisional heads and the end users, so they boost the support from divisional heads and communicate to the employee about the new system and its impact on business process. They have started the project from business requirements and decided to reach the end date rather than to set the date in advanced. As a result the implementation took place in quite excellent way that they started to benefit from new SAP system. The database system became more reliable on business intelligence such as demand forecasting, inventory reducing redistributing expenses which generated a lot of revenue. In addition Nestle made a five year deal with IBM in $500 million for software, hardware, IT services and integration of its mysap. com, e-business software system etc. Nestle was practically successful with SAP system and it was trying to solve the information management system by improving the SAP system all over the world. They were using e-procurement to its major regions to improve the system management. Conclusion ERP implementation is unlikely experience that any company will have. It has to be planned prepared and stimulated from the entire stakeholder otherwise it will sunk the millions of dollar and it drain the companies market. In case of Nestle USA, it confronted a lot of difficulties due to improper implementation plan yet be able to recover as a successful project. Many organisations have gone through the similar situation that there are plenty of lesson to be learned. We can conclude that ERP implementation needs big consideration on business requirement, business process reengineering, stakeholder’s involvement, hardware and software and other units. Three important things Change Management Organisations in these days are dynamic function and they keep changing with technology advancement hand in hand. So every organisation implements changed technology, business process, business function etc. such change have remarkable effect on organisation and its employee which formalize the idea of change management. Change management is most important in any organisation when the organisation is implementing any new technology and system. Change management build up strength to handle the change in organisation. So change management is adequate to any organisation to implement change within the organisation. There are a lot of examples of failure of new technology implementation from past that is due to unaddressed change management. Recently organisations have realised the importance of change management and its impact. Change management is the process of implementing change in such a way that it will involve all the people within the organisation to face and accept change. Change management involves and agree support from people within system, environment, and processes, organisation. It will identify where the organisation at the moment is and after certain change what the organisation will be what are the measures will be for having got there. It plans the change in appropriate way by Communicating, involving, enabling and facilitating people, as early and openly and as fully as possible. As we have discuss in our Nestle case study their first attempt to implement ERP was not successful because of poor change management. Business process reengineering Business process reengineering is change in the current process of doing business in to completely new process. Business process is an act of doing business, for example; for delivering product to costumer, first need to check payment from account department, and need to check stock in go downs, approvals from sales manager and send to costumer. After implementing ERP this process may not remain same because implementing new ERP system is often required to change the business process to match with the functionality or either changes the ERP functionality. Changing the ERP functionality is not easy so normally organization prefer to change its business process to match the functionality. When organization decides to change its business process or reengineers the business process, organization should take care of the ERP functionality and the organizational needs to find the possible solution of reengineering. In case of nestle they have realized business process reengineering is required but their way of reengineering wasn’t sufficient and convenient enough to lead the project to a successful end. ERP implementation plan To implement ERP system there should be some implementation plan based on the scope, time and cost constraint. There are different methodology for ERP implementation by different vendors, among them an organisation should choose the suitable one based on their requirements and business process. There are three type of ERP implementation plan; comprehensive, middle of the road, Vanilla. Comprehensive plan is the lengthy, costly and expensive because it is a full functionality implementation, middle of the road is some change in core modules of ERP and cogent business process reengineering and vanilla approach is using the core ERP function to get the best business practise. When plan is selected, the methodology of implementing should also be clearly drawn. There are traditional methodology, life cycle methodology, fast-track; agile development etc. ecently agile methodology is being popular because it is more practical than any others. Agile approach assumes that whatever the requirements might be at the beginning of the project, they won’t remain same at the end. So ERP implementation is a plan not just set of time as nestle has done in the beginning. Question 2 Complexity of ERP implementation Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems are the system which integrat e the data across and be comprehensive in supporting all major function. ERP systems are the specific software application which helps organisation to operate its function such as; accounting, finance, marketing, human resource etc. ERP system provides integrated system that operates in real time without relying on periodic updates and common database, which supports all applications. Implementing ERP system in any organization is complex task as it involves a lot of change which certainly creates the possibility of confusion and creates complexity. In these days business organization have become complex with a lot of layer of management and dependencies between departments. All the departments within the organization need a lot of communication to complete the business process. ERP systems are to ease the process of business within the organization, but ERP implementation is not similar to those other application like MS office, data base software etc. ERP implementation project needs a lot consideration and research and it has high risk of failure as well. The crucial thing for successful ERP implementation is to use the proper methodology, to take one step at a time and begin with the understanding of ERP life cycle. Even though we use proper methodology it’s not possible to implement it without discord. There are lot things which make the ERP implementation complex. The very first thing is selection of ERP vendors. There are a lot of vendors in the market providing the ERP and they all have different features. When an organization decides to implement ERP in very beginning it will face is what type, size, and scope of the future system it actually requires and how to choose the most suitable solution among the vendors but there is no Specific solution for it. Organisation itself has to make decision of suitability of system according to their business function and needs. First it needs to find what functionality is required and what future perspective for the system is. If it is not lined out clearly organisation might not select the right vendor. Including the business function organisation has to look at the various other things such as; features and integration capability of software, licensing and upgrades, infrastructure requirements, total cost of ownership etc. The second thing relates to the people within the organisation and has big impact on ERP implementation. New system implementation brings the big change and if that change is not managed properly it will bring tsunami. Past experiences shows that often the organisations were failed to manage the change due to improper management. People always act reversely when imposed new things up on them until they were awaked about the profitability of that. So people within the organisation needs to aware of change by Communicating, involving, enabling. Every person has his own thoughts and value. Convincing them and involving them is not so easy and without doing that implementation also becomes difficult. The third thing is business process reengineering. Business process is the actual act of doing business, for example; for delivering product to costumer, first need to check payment from account department, and need to check stock in go downs, approvals from sales manager and send to costumer. After implementing ERP this process may not remain same because implementing new ERP system is often required to change the business process to match with the functionality or either changes the ERP functionality. Changing the ERP functionality is not easy so normally organization prefer to change its business process though it is also not easily manageable. Changing the business process may create a lot of confusion and may create debate between departments as well. So reengineering of business process in suitable way also plays the vital role. Technically, ERP system may not fit with the current hardware and software may be it needs standardization or some of the third party software needs to be integrated with the ERP software, which is not easy task. Data issue also becomes the major problem after implementing ERP transferring legacy data into the new system from Excel spread sheets, manual records, or old disparate applications. Basically, the question is that old data that have been used and stored for years can for many reasons appear approximate or even incorrect in the new ERP. Operation of ERP and post implementation is also the critical points for successful Implementation. User needs to be trained to use the new system; active support via help desk needs to be provided and so forth. In conclusion, ERP implementation is a risky project, full of uncertainty of successful implementation and has lot of influencing factors affecting the implementation. Many factors such as vendor selection, people issue, technical and data issue, business process etc. makes the ERP implementation complex and creates the confusing situation.